This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/hardware by /u/Noble00_ on 2024-11-07 16:07:34+00:00.

CBr24 1T:

M4 Pro (10p+4e): 177

M4 Max: (12p+4e): 174

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K: 141 (HUB:150)

Ryzen 9 9950X: 134 (HUB:141)

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K: 135 (HUB:145)

Ryzen 9 9900X: 132 (HUB:139)

CBr24 nT:

M4 Pro (10p+4e): 1662

M4 Max: (12p+4e): 1993

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K: 2128 (HUB: 2523)

Ryzen 9 9950X: 2128 (HUB:2345)

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K: 2031 (HUB:2165)

Ryzen 9 9900X: 1715 (HUB:1834)

PugetBench Premiere Pro (Extended Overall):

M4 Pro (10p+4e): n/a

M4 Max: (12p+4e): 9197

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K: 11468

Ryzen 9 9950X: 10410

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K: 11035

Ryzen 9 9900X: 10083

PugetBench Photoshop:

M4 Pro (10p+4e): n/a

M4 Max: (12p+4e): 13422

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K: 9822 (HUB:10329)

Ryzen 9 9950X: 10964 (HUB:11929)

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K: 9528 (HUB:10352)

Ryzen 9 9900X: 10862 (HUB:11853)

Notebookcheck Review on MacBook Pro 14 M4 Pro (German)

YouTuber Matthew Moniz Review on MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max

Intel and AMD Data from Puget Systems

A quick look while reviews trickle in waiting for more proper reviews like Geekerwan unlike from the mainstream. Apple’s yearly cadence in SoCs is just impressive considering what we got from AMD and Intel for a 2 year wait. Do note, Hardware Unboxed numbers are higher in all workloads, and I noticed their Premiere Pro numbers were much higher, which was due to them using Standard Overall scores, Puget uses JEDEC DRAM speed.

Also, while I spat out CPU numbers, from Matthew’s experience and NBC benchmarks, both the M4 Pro and Max is solid for gaming, even through emulation, beating the current best Windows gaming mobile SoC, the Core Ultra 9 288V (which may or may not be surprising given the die size and beefy GPU core layout).