This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/5ftfffgg on 2024-11-22 21:13:20+00:00.

https://parallaxuap.blogspot.com/2021/03/how-dod-is-keeping-tabs-on-uap-related.html?m=1

Is it legal for them to request control of any UAP related FOIA from the office? There is clearly a large effort to hide and obfuscate this topic to the point of strict FOIA control by a single or small group of actors.

Curious as to what you make of this as well. I find this even more interesting in light of Timothy Philips recent linkedin comments where he states there is currently 12 committees governing the UAP issue. He also states that there is no videos or data not being shown when these FOIA requests clearly show intentions otherwise!

Whole lot of action and oversight going on over something that supposedly is not even real or simply foreign “drones” as the DOE energy sec loves to say, or that is balloons as AARO loves to say! Also would like to add “nuances of all this” of what? The document states there is definitely information not even data that cannot be shared publicly. If all UAP are is simply drones and balloons then why classify that?? Obvious obfuscation that warrants congressional attention.

I will say if congress wants first hand whistleblowers then provide adequate protections for people of this nature, and then maybe subpoena James Lacatski and Colm Kelleher? They have told corbel and others of gaining entrance to a craft. Then if subpoenaed they are legally obligated to confess and simultaneously provided the actual protections required which they stated are not currently good enough and they do not have faith in congress to protect them.

https://silvarecord.com/2020/05/09/is-government-spokesperson-gough-thwarting-foia/