This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/linustechtips by /u/KingSmashy_ on 2024-04-09 23:53:41.

Hey guys, hey team. First of all, really enjoy the look so far and hyped to see what’s coming.

However, there are multiple things I’ve noticed, that’d be important for me and certainly for others as well.

  1. While hovering over the benchmark charts, there should be a percentage shown to compare between results. Like German ComputerBase oder PCGH do it for example.

  2. PCB Shots. I know, Linus pointed out that the CT shots exist, so that they don’t have to disassemble a product, but there have been multiple occasions, especially with GPU Watercooling, where I needed PCB Shots and couldn’t find any. So getting that added would be a blast.

  3. I feel like the Highlights Feature doesn’t really add value to the articles content right now, because if it’s meant to be a ‘this stood out positively/negatively’-thing, then calling out a cards architecture or fancount feels like trivial or irrelevant information, that I’d rarely ever need right at the top.

‘4070S only has DP 1.4a’ is a good thing tho, that could actually be important to a reader that might miss it otherwise and can then adjust their purchasing decision. So more actually meaningful information there would be great.

  1. Under the OEM Technologies Tab there are Nvidia Features listed, like for example NVENC/NVDEC that have an AMD counterpart, so listing that as well within AMD Reviews would be important. Leaving it like it is right now, a less informed reader could pick it up as ‘AMD can’t stream’.

What I also noticed, with DLSS 3 there’s the Generation in the List, but with FSR 3 there isn’t. Although that’s not as important, just smth I’ve noticed.

  1. Not allowed to open images in a new tab. I can see how that’s a decision made to prevent getting your images stoles, but at the same time the ability to zoom into pictures is often very helpful.

So some way to add that functionality of (limitless) zooming would be great.

  1. Kinda related to the last point, the images are very low quality, both in terms of resolution and focus. I feel like that’d improve when actual mass testing is happening, but I still wanted to point that out.

Best regards to the team!