This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/boxing by /u/Miserable_Sell_1215 on 2025-06-28 00:56:13+00:00.

One of the biggest topics during this Crawford V Canelo buildup is the talk of Crawfords Resume. And in particular Errol Spence and how he’s not a “great” fighter. How he was a shot fighter. How he is a nothing fighter compared to what Canelo has faced. And it’s such bullshit. Spence was considered top 5 P4P and half of boxing gave Spence a giant chance to defeat Crawford before they fought. Fast forward to today and people talk about Spence like he’s trash but at the same time complain about fighters not willing to risk it. We need to check our discourse on fighters and make so that when a boxer loses against another amazing fighter he isn’t trashed like Errol has been and if not we don’t deserve for big fights to be made