This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/nanocurrency by /u/Psilonemo on 2025-10-20 07:08:39+00:00.

Hello, I’m not an expert in decentralized digital currencies so forgive me if my question is ignorant.

It is my understanding that in theory, holding and using more XNO technically gives one more incentive to secure the network. However, in order for the XNO network to decentralize, it must go through the opposite of a natural pareto distribution, spreading out XNO more evenly across as many entities as possible and smoothing out the curve.

Does this not also mean that in theory, the more decentralized XNO is, the less incentive each entity has to secure the network since they own less?